Auctions?

The idea of an auction draft is causing quite a stir in one of my leagues.  We're a dynasty/keeper league, and we've had a traditional draft for 4 years now, but I've put out the idea of switching to an auction, and some people love it, while others despise the idea.  Most of the frustration is in terms of what value to use on all the keeper players who were drafted with no price.  Any ideas on how to do that fairly are welcome.  One owner brought up the idea of a "pilot" or "test" auction, which is intriguing.  We'll see where all this goes.

Rethinking QB points

So, my initial thoughts on QB passing TDs being worth 6 points was that it's no big deal as long as INTs count more against them too (and it doesn't hurt if you cut back the yardage points as well). 

 

After 7 weeks with that scoring system, I've softened on that point somewhat.  I do see QBs as being more dominant with that scoring system than I'd like to see, but I also notice that if a PPR is added for RBs and WRs, that everything is pretty even. 

 

So my "new stance" is this - 6 points for pass TDs is alright with a couple stipulations: more penalties for INTs, lass points for pass yardage, and a PPR for RBs and WRs.

 

I'll probably change that stance again at season's end.  :-)

Six points for passing TDs?

I've seen and heard a lot of people go on and on about how "terrible" it is to award 6 points for passing touchdowns, versus the usual 4.  "It makes QBs rule the fantasy game," they say.  "It makes RBs and WRs less important!" they gripe.  Well, how about this idea that my league is using this year: 6 points for pass TDs, but penalize INTs by -3 points, instead of the usual -1 point.  We're also ratcheting down the pass yardage points: from 1 pt for 20 yds to 1 pt for 25 yds. 

 

Picture this QB line: 300 yards, 3 TDs, 2 INT.

 

With a traditional scoring system, that QB would score 25 points.

With our scoring system, he would actually score just 24.  ("Oh no, you CAN'T give 6 points for pass TDs, it'll ruin your league!")

 

What we wanted to do was reward QBs who make good decisions about throwing the ball, and penalize them for making poor decisions.  I think our scoring system does a good job of that.

 

What really surprises me is that no one who whines about 6-pt TD passes seems to look at how to keep scores from skyrocketing - they just say, "No, don't do it!"  I am appreciative of people who challenge the status quo and have logical arguments for doing so.

 

Another League

I'm also in a league that we're using an auction format for the first time. This is a free one with people from work. We use sales performance data for each owner to help/hurt your auction dollars that you have available. People with better sales numbers will get more $$$ to use in the auction. In addition, week-by-week, we tabulate sales numbers and use them to add or subtract points from everyone's weekly scores based on performance (this is why there's no money riding on the league :-). I'm actually kind of excited to do this one; we'll have to see how it plays out.

Draft time

So, I've got a fantasy draft coming up this weekend. Two of them, actually, but only one with prizes riding on it. It's the FFLUM, and it's a great league (naturally, I'm the commish, of course I'm gonna say that), but I'm really disappointed with the position I'm in this fall. It's sort of a hybrid keeper/dynasty league: after the annual draft in August, each team gets to select which 5 players to sign to 2- or 3-year contracts. So there are a few keepers, but it's not a "keeper league" in the traditional sense of naming your keepers right before the draft.

Anyway, here's my team right now: Philip Rivers, Kevin Smith, Wes Welker, Dwayne Bowe, Todd Heap, BAL D. I also have Joey Galloway and Fred Taylor on my bench that could fill the last starting spot (a RB/WR flex). So I'm not in terrible shape there, however, I am left with few picks (in a 12-team league) after a trade or three: #10 and #34 overall. Then, 5th, 5th, 8th, 9th, 10th, and 10th round picks.

In my mind, our draft this year really only offers 7-8 quality players: Brady and Brees at QB; Slaton, P.Thomas, and maybe Moreno or D.Ward at RB; A.Johnson, S.Smith (CAR), and Wayne at WR. After those guys, you're looking at Warner or Houshmandzadeh or even T.O. as next best players available. Slim pickings.

So I'm hoping some of the other owners reach for a guy like T.O. or Warner, maybe allowing Pierre Thomas to slide down to my spot at 10. I think that would be huge. I just don't like the idea of Housh being the guy on whom I spend my top pick. The drop off after those top 7-8 is just so huge. I fret about it more each day as the draft nears.

I was the inaugural winner of this league in '06, and was the top seed in the playoffs last season (until my team laid a complete egg in week 15), so I feel like I have a little bit of a reputation to uphold as a competetive team - but this year worries me a little bit. I just don't know what to expect.

Hello

However you happened to find this blog, welcome. It's my first attempt at a blogging; I hope to keep the self-embarassment to a minimum. My plan is to use the blog to ruminate on anything I notice or think about with fantasy sports (ideas, player rankings, etc.), but particularly fantasy football. I know there are lots of other sites and blogs devoted to this cause as well but I hope that mine can appeal specifically to league commissioners, as well as to casual fantasy players and fans.

There's really no schedule for any regular posts; it'll just be whenever the urge to post happens to strike me. Feel free to post a comment anytime.